News - Rock Band 2: The Opening Act
Posted by
Christopher Pioli
at 09:02:48 PM EST on 6.30.2008.
It's no surprise by now, but the tremendous success of
Rock Band has motivated Harmonix to develop a sequel -
Rock Band 2: The Opening Act.
The game will feature a new set of tracks, and will be compatible with
Rock Band's cache of downloadable content. The
Rock Band 2 bundle is also set to feature a new set of "quieter, more realistic, and more reliable instruments" according to lead designer Dan Teasdale. But for current
Rock Band owners, don't worry about having to purchase
Rock Band 2 just to keep up with new DLC - it'll be cross-compatible between the two titles.
Rock Band 2: The Opening Act will make its debut at E3 in just two weeks. It will be released for the Xbox 360 in September in both the United States and Europe (however there isn't any confirmation that they'll be released on the same day). The game will be available for the PlayStation 3 at the end of the year.
Source: Kotaku
Comments
Please
log in or
register to post comments.
+0 karma
i_like_pizza 7.2.2008 at 10:05:39 PM
Catering to the consumer like that would be wrong, daetrin. Big company policy clearly states that the consumer is always wrong and their opinions don't matter. You need to read up on modern corporate policies.
+0 karma
azu 7.2.2008 at 06:48:55 PM
I had respect for Harmonix before. After the catastrophy that is also called Rock Band & The Breaking Instruments (and its sequel: Rock Band & The European Release), I'm not. They've shown that they don't give a s*** about the customer.
So, in turn, I won't give a s*** about their games anymore. And as I don't like the way how Neversoft & Activision handle Guitar Hero nowadays, I'm not interested in World Tour either.
But hey, at least I'll save tons of money when I don't have to pay for some toy drums.
+0 karma
cainkid 7.2.2008 at 01:43:54 AM
while that would be awesome, I really cannot see them doing that ever.
Of course I really didn't see them keeping the DLC either so I am open to being surprised.
+0 karma
daetrin 7.1.2008 at 08:25:57 PM
I'm not sure which (if any) side you're trying to support cainkid, but if they're smart they'll offer everything piecemeal, it encourages people to stick with their product without forcing anyone to upgrade anything they don't want to. They've got the first to market advantage and they should use that for all the leverage its worth, and from what we've been told so far that's exactly what they're doing.
They may have the songs that come with the game available for DLC too, but if the manage to pack at least 20 or so good ones on the disk then the incentive to just pay $30 or so more to get the songs you want, plus some so-so songs, plus the new visuals. You've already got the old peripherals so that's all you need. But if they actually do improve the peripherals significantly then maybe you'll hold on to the old ones just long enough to save up some money to swap them out one at a time for the new version as you save money. And as long as they upgrade both the game and the peripherals enough to be equivalent to what Guitar Hero: WT is putting out then there won't be much inventive to spend $200(?) to get a whole new system when you can upgrade your current one a little at a time, getting only the components you feel are worth it.
If they're really smart and can keep track of such things they'll make the RB2 content available as DLC from day one, but every time you select one of the songs it will say something like "This song is included as part of Rock Band 2, available in stores now for $##.##! If you purchase this song now and upgrade to Rock Band 2 later we'll refund any included songs for credits good towards the purchase of other DLC!"
+0 karma
cainkid 7.1.2008 at 06:48:36 PM
Well in the past daetrin we didn't have situations like this where a game is mostly a cosmetic change and you have a lot of the content with you.
It will depend on the new features they add, but otherwise if people can keep the same instruments and keep their DLC... then what all are they getting with Rock Band 2? New visuals (not an important game function) and new non-DLC songs (More important.)
There are some games to where an MMO type subscription could shut down the need for new games in a legit way. If they made a new madden that you only had to pay for your new roster every year, there would be little need for new madden games (Cause seriously that series pretends to take steps forward, taking credit loudly for innovations they made quietly in previous versions).
As for this, Rock Band 2 vs Guitar Hero: WT will be very interesting. Guitar Hero respects the Wii more, so I am not counting them out. Harmonix treats the Wii like a PS2, which is ridiculous considering the sales it can produce and the userbase it has.
+0 karma
kingbagel 7.1.2008 at 06:39:37 PM
eggmanimn - agreed, the apparent problems with GH:A go beyond just being a gameplay rehash. I like Aerosmith, prefer their older stuff, but I can't see myself enjoying a game centered around their music, especially with so few songs and no DLC opportunities. I think if they really want to continue with a line of "spinoff" games, they should make them genre-specific, not band-specific. For example, the rumored Guitar Hero: Metallica is cool, but I'd rather just have Guitar Hero: Metal.
Which reminds me, I'm still waiting for some Megadeth and Pantera in Rock Band. Somebody, make it happen.
+2 karma
daetrin 7.1.2008 at 06:21:42 PM
Geez, they came out with a game that got very good reviews, and when their competitors came out with a similar game they produced a sequel with better peripherals, new features, and it will be backwards compatible with the old instruments and the new DLC will be backwards compatible with the old game, and a lot of you guys _still_ want to complain about it?
It sure sounds to me like they're going out of their way to provide added value to new and "hardcore" players without forcing anyone to upgrade who doesn't want to.
And i hate to tell you all, but if no company ever released a game until they'd perfected it to the point where no future sequels were needed or required, then no one would ever release any games at all!
+0 karma
jekku 7.1.2008 at 12:39:18 PM
I'm sure they will sell the game with no instruments but the quality instruments coming with Rock Band 2 that don't break, wear down quickly or have other flaws should've been the instruments that came with Rock Band.
Guitar Hero seems to be evolving, even if it is becoming more like Rock Band. After World Tour, it will be interesting to see if they continue to keep it fresh.
+0 karma
eggmanimn 7.1.2008 at 12:32:45 PM
kingbagel, I think the problem with GH:Aerosmith is that it's A. too few songs for way too much money, B. too much of the same sound and C. Aerosmith is fairly boring in general.
+0 karma
thehawk 7.1.2008 at 12:26:27 PM
I'm glad to see they're letting my downloaded songs work for the sequel.
"Innovation (that is, the idea that every new entry MUST have some new gameplay addition) RUINS music games. All they need is a solid mechanic to start with and new music to keep it going."
Right. I'd be perfectly fine with just getting more downloadable content.
+0 karma
joesteele 7.1.2008 at 08:05:59 AM
"These are things that should've been worked out in the first Rock Band. Rock Band is a pretty expensive toy. They have to pretty confident that their fans and more will invest in Rock Band 2."
I HIGHLY doubt that they will force everyone to repurchase all the equipment again. I think they just said that if you want, you can get better instruments by buying the bundle.
+0 karma
kingbagel 7.1.2008 at 07:59:15 AM
With Guitar Hero upping the ante with World Tour, Harmonix would be hard-pressed NOT to release a sequel. Here's the full interview. It doesn't reveal everything, but it goes more in-depth than this article suggests. They're adding a lot of new features and gameplay, as well.
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/885/885195p1.html
Personally, I don't care one bit about buying a sequel. At least I don't have to buy all-new instruments to enjoy the game, and I can keep the small collection of DLC I already have.
And eggmanimn: there has been very little innovation in the Guitar Hero series (in what has been released to this point, I mean), and from what I can tell, that's the biggest complaint with the fifth iteration, GH: Aerosmith. Same game, new songs. That's doesn't cut it, imo. You have to build on the formula to keep the game fresh. If Rock Band 2 delivers on Teasdale's promises of "new ways to experience your music library" and expands the series' horizons, I'm all for it.
+0 karma
jekku 7.1.2008 at 04:53:38 AM
Ugh. These are things that should've been worked out in the first Rock Band. Rock Band is a pretty expensive toy. They have to pretty confident that their fans and more will invest in Rock Band 2.
+0 karma
eggmanimn 7.1.2008 at 01:35:39 AM
I'll be blunt. Innovation (that is, the idea that every new entry MUST have some new gameplay addition) RUINS music games. All they need is a solid mechanic to start with and new music to keep it going.
+0 karma
drk 6.30.2008 at 10:05:38 PM
As long as the Band World Tour is actually online, I say bring it.
+0 karma
i_like_pizza 6.30.2008 at 09:47:21 PM
Already? Say hello to the new Madden. Same thing year after year with slight improvements. Not saying the game is bad, but I thought that Harmonix would actually care to innovate with each new entry, rather than update, and I'm suspecting that a new title this early isn't going to be anything but a face-lift.